Mandatory disclosure rules protect buyers by ensuring they understand the financial and legal commitments of timeshare ownership. Without these rules, many buyers face unexpected costs, lifelong obligations, and limited usage rights. Here’s a quick summary:

  • Rescission Rights: Buyers can cancel contracts within 3–15 days, depending on the state.
  • Cost Transparency: Contracts must disclose ongoing fees like maintenance (which increase annually by ~5%), taxes, and special assessments.
  • Property Details: Usage rules, reservation systems, and amenities must be clearly outlined.
  • Legal Protections: Violations of disclosure rules can make contracts voidable, freeing buyers from obligations.

Federal regulations, like the FTC Act, ILSA, and Telemarketing Sales Rule, work alongside state laws to ensure transparency and penalize deceptive practices. If you’re misled, you can report issues or seek legal help to void contracts and recover losses.

Key takeaway: Always review timeshare contracts carefully, verify disclosures, and know your rights before signing.

Federal Regulations Governing Timeshare Disclosures

State laws form the backbone of timeshare disclosure requirements, but federal regulations step in to provide an added layer of consumer protection. These rules aim to prevent fraud, ensure clarity, and arm buyers with the information they need before committing to a timeshare. Below, we’ll break down the key federal regulations that play a role.

Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act)

Federal Trade Commission

The Federal Trade Commission Act is the federal government’s main tool for cracking down on deceptive and unfair practices in the timeshare industry. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) uses this law to investigate and prosecute fraudulent activities, particularly in the area of timeshare resales.

One major focus for the FTC has been timeshare resale scams, which have grown more common in recent years. Since 2015, the FTC’s Consumer Sentinel Network has logged about 2,500 complaints annually related to timeshare resale fraud.

A notable case occurred in December 2016, when the FTC charged several individuals and companies, including Jess Kinmont, John P. Wenz Jr., and Pro Timeshare Resales of Flagler Beach LLC, with running a fraudulent scheme. They allegedly scammed consumers out of $15 million by collecting large upfront fees and falsely promising to sell or rent their timeshares. This case also involved violations of the Telemarketing Sales Rule, such as making illegal calls to numbers listed on the Do Not Call Registry.

Another case from June 2013 targeted Resort Solution Trust Inc. and its operators, Lincoln Renwick II and Anthony Talavera. They were accused of misleading thousands of consumers into paying advance fees ranging from $800 to $3,400 for services that were never delivered. These enforcement actions highlight the FTC’s commitment to ensuring transparency and protecting buyers from predatory practices.

Next, let’s look at how the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act works to safeguard consumers in property-related transactions.

Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (ILSA)

Enacted in 1968, the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (ILSA) governs the sale of lots in subdivisions by developers. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) currently oversees ILSA, taking over this responsibility from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in 2011.

Under ILSA, developers must provide potential buyers with a detailed Property Report before any sale or lease agreement is signed. This report includes critical details about the developer, the property, and the subdivision itself, such as title information, layout, available services, amenities, and location.

To prevent fraud, ILSA prohibits developers from making false statements, omitting key facts, or engaging in any deceptive practices. Buyers also benefit from a two-year revocation right: if they don’t receive the required Property Report, they can cancel their contract within two years of signing.

Violating ILSA carries serious consequences. Willful violations can lead to fines of up to $10,000 and up to five years in prison. Additionally, the CFPB can impose civil penalties of $1,000 per violation, capped at $1,000,000 annually.

Court cases have clarified how ILSA applies to timeshare transactions. For example, in Beaver v. Tarsadia Hotels (2016), the Ninth Circuit ruled that hotel-condominium units in the Hard Rock Hotel and Condominium Project qualified as "lots" under ILSA because they offered recurring use for specific periods. On the other hand, in PFW Inc. v. Residences at Little Nell Development, LLC (2012), a Colorado court determined that a fractional interest in a condominium didn’t count as a "lot" under ILSA because it didn’t grant exclusive possession of a unit.

Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR)

The Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) plays a critical role in regulating telemarketing practices within the timeshare resale industry. It works hand-in-hand with the FTC Act to combat fraudulent telemarketing schemes.

The TSR prohibits telemarketers from calling numbers listed on the National Do Not Call Registry and mandates specific disclosures during sales calls. Violations of the TSR often feature prominently in FTC enforcement actions.

For example, in June 2013, the FTC charged Vacation Communications Group LLC and its operators – Mark Russell Gardner, Tammie Lynn Cline, and Sheldon Lee Cohen – with violating the TSR. These individuals allegedly charged consumers $1,600 to $2,200 while falsely claiming they had buyers ready to finalize timeshare sales. The defendants were also accused of breaking Florida laws, including the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act and the Florida Timeshare Resale Accountability Act, illustrating how federal and state laws work together to tackle fraud.

If consumers encounter violations of federal regulations, they can report them directly to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov. This reporting system helps the agency identify patterns of abuse and build cases against repeat offenders.

Federal regulations like these provide crucial safeguards for consumers, complementing state-level laws. While they don’t replace state regulations, they ensure that timeshare companies operating across state lines adhere to consistent standards of honesty and transparency.

Required Elements in Timeshare Disclosures

Federal regulations require timeshare companies to provide buyers with specific information before signing any contracts. These mandatory disclosures are designed to ensure consumers fully understand what they’re committing to, especially since timeshares often represent a long-term financial obligation. Knowing what should be disclosed can help you verify whether a company is following the law and being transparent.

Rescission Rights and Cooling-off Periods

Every timeshare contract must clearly outline your right to cancel within a specific timeframe. This period, often called a cooling-off period, lets you back out of the agreement without penalties if you change your mind after signing.

The disclosure should specify the exact length of this rescission period, which typically ranges from three to fifteen days, depending on the state. It should also clarify whether the countdown starts when you sign the contract or when you receive all required disclosure documents.

To cancel, you’ll need clear instructions on the process: where to send your cancellation letter, what details to include, and the deadline for postmarking your notice. Contracts usually require that you send this letter via certified mail with return receipt, ensuring there’s a record of your cancellation.

For example, include your member or contract number, have all buyers sign, and mail the letter through USPS Certified Mail (with return receipt) before the deadline. Keep copies of everything for your records.

Financial Breakdown and Costs

Timeshare contracts must provide a full breakdown of the costs involved – not just the initial purchase price. This is critical because timeshare ownership often comes with ongoing financial obligations that can last a lifetime.

The disclosure should detail recurring costs such as annual maintenance fees, which averaged $980 in 2018. It should also explain that these fees typically increase by about 5% each year. For instance, a $980 fee could grow to over $4,200 annually after 30 years.

Other ongoing expenses that must be disclosed include:

  • Special assessments for unexpected repairs or upgrades
  • Exchange program fees for using your timeshare at other locations
  • Property taxes and insurance costs, if applicable
  • Transaction fees for booking, changing, or canceling reservations

The contract must make it clear that these fees are required for as long as you own the timeshare, whether you use it or not, and they remain your responsibility until you sell the timeshare or pass away. Unlike mortgages or car loans, which are subject to the federal Truth in Lending Act, many states don’t have strict rules requiring timeshare companies to warn buyers about these long-term and increasing costs.

Property Details and Usage Rules

Federal guidelines also require timeshare companies to disclose specific details about the property and how it can be used. This helps ensure buyers aren’t blindsided by restrictions or limitations after signing the contract.

The disclosure should explain the reservation system, including any rules, restrictions, or fees involved. It should cover how far in advance you can book, whether certain weeks or seasons are restricted, and what happens if you need to cancel or reschedule.

Additionally, the contract must outline the property’s features and accommodations. This includes the size and type of units you’re entitled to, available amenities (like pools or restaurants), and how the property is maintained. For example, if you’re promised a specific type of unit during the sales pitch, that promise must appear in the written contract to be legally binding.

In 2016, the Arizona Attorney General’s Office reached a settlement with Diamond Resorts, emphasizing the importance of accurate property disclosures. As part of the settlement, $650,000 in consumer restitution was provided, and many misled buyers were allowed to exit their timeshare contracts. This saved hundreds of Arizona consumers an estimated $25 million in future fees.

Disclosures should also include information about exchange programs, which allow you to use your timeshare at different locations. These details should cover associated fees, availability, and the type of accommodations you can expect when exchanging.

As North Carolina General Statute § 93A-44 states:

"The developer is prohibited from making any representations other than those contained in the contract of sale and this public offering statement."

In other words, any promises made during sales presentations must also appear in the written disclosures. If a salesperson mentions amenities, usage rights, or financial perks that aren’t in the contract, those claims likely aren’t enforceable.

To protect yourself, review all disclosure documents carefully. Verify the details about amenities, maintenance, and reservations, and consider consulting a qualified professional or tax expert to fully understand the financial and legal implications of your purchase.

When timeshare agreements fail to meet legal standards, buyers aren’t left without options. Both federal and state laws provide avenues to address misleading practices, especially when key disclosures are withheld. Let’s break down how these protections work.

Federal Enforcement Actions

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) plays a central role in policing timeshare disclosure violations. As the federal agency responsible for protecting consumers, the FTC targets companies that engage in deceptive practices, such as misrepresenting vacation packages or failing to share required information with buyers.

Each year since 2015, the FTC’s Consumer Sentinel Network has received around 9,500 complaints related to timeshare sales and resales. These reports help the agency identify patterns of misconduct and focus enforcement efforts on repeat offenders.

One major case unfolded in November 2022, when the DOJ, FTC, and Wisconsin filed civil action against 16 defendants accused of misleading seniors about timeshare exit services. The defendants falsely claimed they were affiliated with legitimate companies and convinced consumers they couldn’t exit their contracts independently. In total, these deceptive practices cost seniors over $90 million for services that were never delivered.

Federal actions often result in monetary relief for consumers, civil penalties for violators, and injunctive measures to prevent future misconduct. The FTC also requires companies to adopt better disclosure practices and submit to ongoing compliance checks.

Charles Harwood, acting director of the FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection, summed up the agency’s advice to timeshare owners:

"Our message to timeshare owners is simple: Never pay for a promise, get everything in writing first, and pay only after your unit is sold."

While federal enforcement is crucial, individual buyers also have their own legal options, as explained below.

Private Right of Action

If a developer violates disclosure requirements, buyers can take legal action on their own. The Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (ILSA) is one key federal law that empowers buyers to challenge incomplete or misleading disclosures during a timeshare purchase.

Under ILSA, buyers can seek contract rescission, effectively voiding the agreement and recovering their money. This remedy doesn’t just compensate buyers – it completely undoes the transaction as if it never happened.

State laws provide additional protections. For example, in Florida, buyers have extended rights to cancel their agreements:

  • If a closing occurs before the cancellation period expires, the closing is voidable for up to five years.
  • If a buyer unknowingly waives their cancellation rights and a closing occurs, the closing is voidable for up to one year after the cancellation period would have ended.

Private lawsuits have also led to significant victories for consumers. In New Jersey, a Superior Court jury awarded a $1,069,285 verdict to plaintiffs deceived by FantaSea Resorts over its misleading sales practices in Atlantic City.

State laws also impose steep penalties for violators. In Florida, for instance, companies involved in resale scams face penalties of up to $15,000 per violation if they fail to meet specific disclosure requirements.

Role of Aaronson Law Firm

Aaronson Law Firm

For buyers seeking expert legal help, Aaronson Law Firm offers specialized services in timeshare-related cases. Unlike timeshare exit companies, Aaronson Law Firm is staffed by licensed attorneys who are legally obligated to prioritize their clients’ interests.

Here’s what they provide:

  • Free Consultations: Attorneys review your timeshare contract, sales materials, and disclosures to identify violations.
  • Legal Demand Letters: These letters, issued directly to timeshare companies, carry significant weight because they come from licensed attorneys. They outline specific disclosure violations and the legal remedies available to clients.
  • Credit Protection: To minimize the impact on credit reports, the firm sends letters to credit reporting agencies while clients challenge their timeshare contracts.
  • Case Preparation: They assist clients in gathering all necessary documentation, including account numbers, sales information, and paperwork related to the timeshare purchase.

As the firm states on its website:

"The objective of our timeshare attorneys is to protect you from timeshare abuse."

Aaronson Law Firm also provides educational resources and tailored legal strategies to help clients understand their rights and take action against disclosure violations. By focusing exclusively on timeshare issues, they ensure their clients receive targeted and effective support.

For those who suspect they’ve been misled in their timeshare purchase, working with experienced attorneys can make all the difference in navigating these complex legal waters.

sbb-itb-d69ac80

Consequences of Non-Compliance with Disclosure Rules

When timeshare developers fail to meet disclosure requirements, the repercussions can be both legal and financial. These consequences often lead to hefty settlements and allow buyers to escape misleading agreements. A key enforcement mechanism is contract voidability, which immediately releases buyers from their financial obligations.

Contract Voidability

One of the most immediate outcomes of violating disclosure rules is that buyers can void their entire timeshare contract. This means the agreement becomes unenforceable, freeing buyers from any financial commitments. Voidability typically occurs when developers mislead buyers or fail to provide the necessary disclosures during the sales process.

"If a consumer can prove they entered into the contract because of a misrepresentation and that they have suffered loss as a result, the contract is voidable by the injured party and may be rescinded (returning the parties to their original, pre-contractual positions)."

  • National Timeshare Helpline

Several specific violations can make a contract voidable. Misrepresentation or fraud during the sales process is one of the most common grounds, though proving such claims requires substantial evidence. Additionally, every state enforces a cooling-off period – ranging from 3 to 14 days – during which buyers can cancel the agreement without penalty. If developers fail to honor these rescission rights, buyers gain further leverage to void their contracts.

Hidden terms and undisclosed fees also provide strong grounds for voiding an agreement. Grace Ordonez from the Arizona Attorney General’s Office highlights the issue:

"Most states lack disclosure rules that would put a consumer on notice that they are signing up for a lifelong commitment to pay an undetermined amount of money that will increase each year."

  • Grace Ordonez, Consumer Litigation Unit, Arizona Attorney General’s Office

For instance, while the average maintenance fee was $980 in 2018, a modest 5% annual increase over 30 years could push that fee to over $4,200 per year. If these escalating costs aren’t clearly disclosed, buyers have a strong case to void their contracts. Beyond voidability, developers who violate disclosure rules also face steep penalties.

Civil and Criminal Penalties

State and federal agencies impose significant fines and enforcement actions on developers who break disclosure laws. A notable example is the Diamond Resorts settlement, which demonstrated how serious these penalties can be. Both state agencies and the U.S. Department of Justice actively pursue cases involving disclosure violations and scams targeting vulnerable buyers. Federal agencies also monitor these issues, with consumer complaints often prompting vigorous enforcement efforts.

The National Association of Attorneys General emphasizes the importance of full disclosure for protecting consumers:

"If consumers were made aware of the timeshare’s actual life-long financial obligation and, consequently, the transaction’s high risk, many would not elect to buy. At the very least, disclosure would provide consumers with the information necessary to make informed decisions."

  • National Association of Attorneys General

Conclusion

Mandatory disclosure rules play a crucial role in protecting buyers by ensuring they receive essential information before committing to a timeshare purchase. These regulations bring much-needed transparency to an industry often criticized for aggressive sales tactics and incomplete disclosures. This clarity helps safeguard consumers across millions of transactions.

With around nine million U.S. households owning timeshares and the industry valued at $9.6 billion, proper disclosure isn’t just about individual decisions – it impacts millions of people. When buyers fully understand the costs and responsibilities of ownership, they can make informed choices and avoid unexpected financial burdens down the line.

To enforce these rules, mechanisms like contract voidability and penalties are in place. Contract voidability empowers consumers to exit agreements made under misleading circumstances, while civil and criminal penalties hold developers accountable for failing to comply. These measures ensure that transparency isn’t just a guideline – it’s a requirement.

For buyers who encounter disclosure violations, expert legal assistance can be a game-changer. Firms like Aaronson Law Firm, which specializes in timeshare contract cancellations, offer services such as free consultations, legal demand letters, credit protection, and litigation support. These resources help consumers address hidden fees and unethical sales practices effectively.

As the timeshare industry evolves, mandatory disclosure rules remain vital for building trust and ensuring fair practices. By prioritizing transparency and accountability, these regulations not only protect individual buyers but also strengthen the industry’s reputation over time.

FAQs

What information must be included in a timeshare contract to meet mandatory disclosure requirements?

In the United States, timeshare contracts are legally required to include specific disclosures aimed at protecting buyers and promoting transparency. These disclosures must clearly state:

  • The names and addresses of all parties involved.
  • The purchase price, along with any extra costs like maintenance fees or special assessments.
  • A public offering statement detailing the property, usage rights, and cancellation policies.

Buyers must receive the public offering statement before signing the contract, ensuring they have all the information needed to make a well-informed decision. Additionally, any recurring fees or dues must be disclosed upfront, as these often represent long-term financial commitments. These regulations are in place to safeguard consumers from hidden costs and deceptive sales tactics.

How can timeshare buyers avoid scams and what should they do if they’ve been defrauded?

To steer clear of timeshare scams, it’s important to stay alert to unsolicited offers, especially those that claim your timeshare has an unusually high resale value. Be cautious of companies that demand upfront fees or pressure you into wiring money or using prepaid cards – these tactics are major warning signs. Always take the time to research the company’s reputation and confirm its legitimacy before moving forward with any transaction.

If you’ve been targeted by a timeshare scam, act quickly. File a complaint with the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) or reach out to your state’s consumer protection agency. In some cases, legal action may help you recover financial losses or hold fraudulent businesses accountable. Consulting with experienced legal professionals, like Aaronson Law Firm, can guide you through the process and help you explore your options for restitution.

What happens if a timeshare developer doesn’t follow mandatory disclosure rules?

If a timeshare developer doesn’t follow required disclosure rules, the fallout can be both legal and financial. Buyers might be granted extra time to cancel their contracts if the necessary disclosures were late or incomplete. This could even lead to contracts being voided entirely. On top of that, developers could face lawsuits, fines, administrative penalties, or even see their sales agreements invalidated.

Ignoring these rules can also damage a developer’s reputation and lead to costly penalties or other enforcement measures. For buyers, knowing these rules is key – they offer important safeguards when navigating the timeshare buying process.